Hitler and Liberty County DA Mike Little.

Readers need to know any credibility District Attorney Mike Little had with us has long been gone because of his behavior not our politics. We are aware that those who have read our assertions of political persecution and selective prosecution who still believe in this District Attorney fall in two categories. Some are friends or family or have a financial connection to Mr. Little. This article or any other information that may come to light in the near future is unlikely to change the opinion of those who fall in this category. Then there is another category- those who smell a rat but think that Mr. Little is odor free. Most of us have been raised to have great respect for law enforcement and we require a reason to distrust them over their accusers.

We know there are many reasons to distrust Mr. Little, but we also he has made quite an effort to discredit anyone who challenges him. So this article really asks readers to think about one aspect of the case he has against two of Liberty dispatch’s contributors. This article ask you to consider the hundreds of thousands of dollars he has spent in the last few years on the case he claims to have against Eddie Shauberger and Ray Akins. We have repeatedly asked one simple nagging question that we have been unable to even make up an answer to that Mr. Little would want to admit. Today we have one question we want those who tend to be like us and give law enforcement the benefit of the doubt: “What about the handwriting samples?”

Two years ago this May Mr. Little asked that Eddie Shauberger and Ray Akins provide handwriting samples in anticipation that his case would be dismissed if he could not prove that some of the documents in the case had forged signatures. Despite requests, the District Attorney has failed to present these results to the attorneys of the accused or to the court (or to the media). What about those results, Mr. Little?
Could it be it takes longer than two years to get such results?

In the 1980s, a man named Konrad Kujau, a supposed collector of Nazi memorabilia, approached a German publishing company with 60 handwritten journals purported to be written by Adolf Hitler that had, according to seemed to be genuine, and Kujau had an apparently good reputation, so the publishing company paid $2.3 million for the lot. The diaries were immediately published in installment form in a German newspaper owned by the same publishing company, and syndication rights were sold to several international publications, including The London Times. It was The Times that requested a professional handwriting analysis to ensure authenticity. Three international experts in forensic handwriting analysis compared the diaries to exemplars that were apparently known to be written by Hitler. All agreed that the diaries were written by the same person who wrote the exemplars. The diaries were for real. All of this analysis was done in six months, leaving us to still wonder -what about the results, Mr. Little?

Perhaps Mr. Little would say some cases are more difficult and require more time. But again if we look at the case of the Hitler diaries we find such difficulties and the handwriting analysis was done in a fourth of the time Mr. Little has already taken. With the Hitler diaries it was an analysis of the ink and paper used to write the diaries that revealed them as fakes. An ultraviolet-light examination revealed that the paper contained an ingredient that wasn't used in paper until 1954. Hitler died in 1945. Further forensic tests on the ink showed it had been applied to the paper within the last 12 months. As it turns out, though, the handwriting analysis was in fact correct - the person who'd written the diaries had also written the exemplars. Kujau, later found out to be an experienced con artist, had also forged the exemplars the police were using as comparison documents.

Where are your results Mr. Little? Handwriting analysis results will be one more nail in your case, but where are they? Could it be that he doesn’t want to drop the case because he knows his attempt to settle a political score for himself and others will backfire when he does? He considers the time and the money he has spent on this personal vendetta an investment. Never mind that it is taxpayer money and never mind he is yet to find a charge to successfully prosecute, he is still searching for a charge he can imprison his political enemies on. Never mind that the facts lead to a crime that would imprison Eddie Shauberger’s ex partners and totally vindicate Shauberger and Ray Akins.

Please... If you have believed KSHN and i-dineout’s innuendos, please consider the fact Mr. Little refuses to present the results of handwriting analysis he requested and begin to wonder if this case is just what we have said it has been all along.

For over 700 days, the court record will clearly show, Liberty County DA Mike Little has gotten up in court and baldfaced lied to first Judge Hight and then Judge Mark Morefield over and over again about these exemplars and motions that have not been heard. Mike Little has made a complete mockery of the 75th Judicial District Court with his lie after lie.